Comments on: Reposted: An Open Letter http://www.gendersaurusrex.com/2009/06/reposted-an-open-letter/ chomping gender normativity Thu, 04 Mar 2010 04:05:03 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Confused Diction http://www.gendersaurusrex.com/2009/06/reposted-an-open-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-397 Confused Diction Tue, 21 Jul 2009 04:17:36 +0000 http://www.gendersaurusrex.com/?p=496#comment-397 I think your usage of some terms is a bit wacky. I don't think you mean corrollary, considering corrollary is not a word. I don't think you mean corollary either. I think you mean complement. Also, I have an issue with you claiming that you say "cisgender" is "a way to describe binary-identified OR gender-normative people." I don't think that someone that is gender-normative should be, by definition, put into the grouping of cisgender. There is a good number of people that consider themselves genderless that would fall under society's scope of "gender normative." I feel in your definition you are trivializing their personal identifications. Thanks, CD I think your usage of some terms is a bit wacky. I don’t think you mean corrollary, considering corrollary is not a word. I don’t think you mean corollary either. I think you mean complement.

Also, I have an issue with you claiming that you say “cisgender” is “a way to describe binary-identified OR gender-normative people.” I don’t think that someone that is gender-normative should be, by definition, put into the grouping of cisgender. There is a good number of people that consider themselves genderless that would fall under society’s scope of “gender normative.” I feel in your definition you are trivializing their personal identifications.

Thanks,
CD

]]>